Al Yahar Private School And Kg - American logo

Al Yahar Private School And Kg - American, Al Ain

Principal & Leadership Team

Last updated

Curriculum
American
ADEK
Acceptable
Location
Al Ain, Aamerah
Fees
AED 10K - 30K
Back to Overview

Leadership & Governance

Acceptable
ADEK Leadership Rating (2024–25)
All leadership sub-domains rated Acceptable; held for two consecutive inspection cycles
Acceptable
Overall Irtiqaa Rating (2024–25)
16 of 42 American curriculum schools in the UAE share this rating — lower half of peer group
1,035
Students on Roll
Supported by 6 teaching assistants; full student-teacher ratio not available in sources
Good
Health & Safety Rating
One of few domains to exceed Acceptable baseline; rated Good across all cycles
Good
Personal Development Rating
Rated Good across KG and all cycles; student behaviour and attendance also commended
Acceptable LeadershipeYAHAR Values FrameworkBoard of TrusteesGood SafeguardingParents & Teachers CouncilIndependent School

Principal Ahmad Yahya Sediek Shehata leads Al Yahar Private School and Kindergarten under a values-driven framework he calls the eYAHAR identity — Equity, Yearning, Accountability, Honesty, Acceptance, and Respect. His message to parents emphasises inclusive education, emotional well-being, and dual-pathway academic provision. [MISSING: principal tenure — start date not available in sources]. The school operates as an independent institution governed by a Board of Trustees with defined responsibilities covering strategic planning, budget approval, principal appointment and evaluation, and compliance with UAE regulations. Board terms are capped at three years, though the school owner is exempt from this limit.

The most recent ADEK Irtiqaa inspection, conducted in May 2025 for AY 2024/25, rated the school Acceptable — a rating it has held for two consecutive inspection cycles. This places YPS among the 16 out of 42 American curriculum schools in the UAE rated at the Acceptable level, meaning it sits in the lower half of its curriculum peer group. All six leadership and management sub-domains — effectiveness of leadership, self-evaluation and improvement planning, parent and community relations, governance, and management of staffing, facilities and resources — were each rated Acceptable. Inspectors noted that leadership responsibilities are distributed and monitored through accountability systems and departmental planning, but that the school's capacity to innovate and raise standards is still developing. Specific recommendations call for stronger alignment between the school's self-evaluation and its development plan, more rigorous lesson observation judgements, and targeted leadership training to sharpen decision-making and strategic planning.

Teaching quality across all cycles and both curriculum streams was also rated Acceptable, with a regression from Good to Acceptable noted in Cycle 3 since the previous inspection. Inspectors acknowledged that teachers demonstrate secure subject knowledge and use real-life examples effectively, particularly in lower cycles. However, areas requiring improvement include planned differentiation, the use of open-ended questioning, and the provision of specific, targeted feedback. The school uses MAP and ACER-IBT data to identify learning gaps, but inspectors found that teachers are still developing their capacity to use this data effectively to adapt tasks for diverse learners. [MISSING: total number of teachers and student-teacher ratio — not provided in inspection report or school profile]. The school employs 6 teaching assistants supporting a roll of 1,035 students. [MISSING: staff qualification percentages — not referenced in available sources].

Parent engagement is supported through a Parents and Teachers Council, orientation sessions — including dedicated PISA awareness briefings — and ongoing communication via meetings and digital platforms. Parents are also actively encouraged to support reading at home through the Kutubee digital platform. Inspectors rated parents and community relations Acceptable, reflecting functional but not yet exemplary engagement. The school's safeguarding procedures were highlighted as a genuine strength, with health and safety rated Good across all cycles — one of the few areas to exceed the Acceptable baseline. Student behaviour, attendance, and personal development were also commended, with personal development rated Good school-wide. [MISSING: staff retention data and turnover figures — not referenced in inspection report or WSA commentary].